A long view of the pot prohibition: interview with John Hudak, author of Marijuana: A Short History
Not long ago, I heard author John Hudak talk about the past, present and future of marijuana on Terry Grossās radio show, āFresh Air.ā Then and there, I decided to read his book, āMarijuana: A Short History.ā Iām happy I did, though I wondered even before I received my review copy in the mail, if Hudak would actually deliver what the subtitle promises in 200-pages. After all, scholars have written books three times as long as his and have failed to say everything that needs to be said on the subject.
Once I began to read āMarijuana: A Short History,ā my doubts vanished. In 13 concise chapters Hudak examines the key issues. From beginning to end he also stays balanced.
āMost Americans and many outside the country look at marijuana prohibition and see it as a failed policy,ā Hudak writes in the last chapter. He adds, āMany observers are skeptical that full scale legalization is the right response.ā
While he uses generic-sounding phrases like āmany observersā and āmost Americans,ā he doesnāt hide behind them. Indeed, he talks candidly about the āfailed drug war.ā Then, too, he pulls no punches when he says that, āthe state of American law is absolutely untenable and is inconsistent with American principles of fairness and equal treatment.ā
Hudak suggests that, āfull-scale legislationā by state governments āmay be the best precondition for creating the laboratories of democracy where workable marijuana policy will be tested.ā
The phrase, ālaboratories of democracy,ā struck me and then stuck with me. Eager for a one-on-one conversation with the author, I called him at his office and interviewed him about marijuana ā thatās the word he prefers over all others. Not pot, grass or cannabis for him.
A senior fellow at the Brookings Institute ā a conservative think-tank in Washington D.C. ā Hudak told me that while he has used marijuana in the past, he doesnāt use it now. If he did consume it now and it became widely known, his work might not be respected, he explained.
So, heās cautious and also acutely aware of what he calls the āhypocrisy of perception.ā
āI can go to a bar and have a martini and that wonāt raise eyebrows,ā he said. āBut if I were to tell people that I get stoned some of them would dismiss my work.ā No doubt thatās true.
Hudak is not the only marijuana expert to steer clear of marijuana cigarettes and cookies, though increasingly pot journalists have come out of the closet.
Peter Hecht, a longtime marijuana columnist for the Sacramento Bee and the author of āWeed Landā (2014), has never said whether or not he uses pot. Maybe he, too, feels heād be discredited if word got out that he consumed cannabis in some shape or form. So far, heās at the back of the cannabis closet.
Hudak isn’t a carbon copy of Hecht. His expertise is pot policy, not police raids on marijuana gardens (Hechtās specialty). Moreover, unlike Hecht, who focuses on northern California, Hudak looks at the whole country. Heās definitely not in the bubble that surrounds many who live in or around the Emerald Triangle, the pot capital of the world.
In Virginia, where Hudak lives, he observes his friends and neighbors and concludes that, āthey care more about jobs, access to education and the middle eastā than they do about cannabis. He adds that in his home state, citizens are āless passionate about pot than citizens in the Emerald Triangle.ā
Like many policy wonks who follow the story of marijuana, and like many inside the industry itself, Hudak wonders what new laws might emerge from the Trump administration and the office of the new attorney general, Jefferson Beauregard “Jeff” Sessions III, who served as an U.S. senator from 1996 until 2016.
As a U.S. Attorney in Alabama in the 1980s, Sessions said he thought Ku Klux Klan members “were OKā until he āfound out they smoked pot.ā Sessions has also called marijuana reform in the U.S. a “tragic mistake.”
Not surprisingly, Hudak isnāt a fan. āAs a federal prosecutor Sessions sought longer prison terms for people of color just because they were people of color,ā Hudak tells me.
He adds, āSessions is an avid Prohibitionist and a potential threat to the whole marijuana industry. He canāt raid every single marijuana business in California, but he can wreak havoc.ā
To pro-marijuana optimists who think that Sessions is a āstateās rights person who will leave California aloneā he says think again and think clearly.
āI canāt imagine Trump will be better than Obama,ā Hudak says. Still, heās guardedly hopeful about the future of legal marijuana.
āBy the end of 2016 more people had used marijuana than in 1990,ā he says. āThe oldest America are those most strongly against it, while younger people, including Millennials, are most strongly for it. The least tolerant people will be replaced by the most tolerant.ā
Perhaps time is on the side of marijuana.
Still, full legalization nationwide might take a decade or more, especially with Sessions as Attorney General.
For now, we have Hudakās readable, affordable ($14.95), and quotable history of marijuana thatās available from the Brookings Institution Press www.brookings.edu/press. I recommend it for teachers, students, parents, police officers and government officials. For those who want the most recent information from Hudak, itās available on the institutionās website, www.brookings.edu/topic/marijuana-policy.
Jonah Raskin, a professor emeritus at Sonoma State University, is the author of Marijuanaland, Dispatches from an American War, published in French as well as English, and shares story credit for the feature length pot film Homegrown.









